Disclaimer:
Readers are advised that the material contained herein is solely for information purposes. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and due diligence, and/or obtain professional advice. Nothing contained herein constitutes a representation by the publisher, nor a solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities. The information contained herein is based on sources which the publisher believes to be reliable, but is not guaranteed to be accurate, and does not purport to be a complete statement or summary of the available data. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The owner, editor, writer and publisher and their associates are not responsible for errors or omissions. They may from time to time have a position in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, and may change their positions without notice. (Any significant positions will be disclosed explicitly. This article is not intended to meet your specific individual investment needs and it is not tailored to your personal financial situation. Nothing contained herein constitutes, is intended, or deemed to be — either implied or otherwise — investment advice. Thomas Humphreys, Pacific Website Company Inc., and other entities in which he has an interest, employees, officers, family, and associates may from time to time have positions in the securities or commodities covered in these publications or web site. We reserve the right to buy and sell such securities or commodities without notice to readers. While the information herein is believed to be accurate and reliable it is not guaranteed or implied to be so. The information herein may not be complete or correct; it is provided in good faith but without any legal responsibility or obligation to provide future updates. Neither Thomas Humphreys, nor anyone else, accepts any responsibility, or assumes any liability, whatsoever, for any direct, indirect or consequential loss arising from the use of the information in these publications or web site.
Forward-Looking Statements: This article may include certain "forward-looking information" within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking statements include predictions, projections and forecasts and are often, but not always, identified by the use of words such as "seek", "anticipate", "believe", "plan", "estimate", "forecast", "expect", "potential", "project", "target", "schedule", budget" and "intend" and statements that an event or result "may", "will", "should", "could" or "might" occur or be achieved and other similar expressions and includes the negatives thereof. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding the potential of the Company's properties are forward-looking statements that involve various risks and uncertainties. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements are based on a number of material factors and assumptions. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Company's expectations include actual exploration results, changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined, future metal prices, availability of capital and financing on acceptable terms, general economic, market or business conditions, uninsured risks, regulatory changes, delays or inability to receive required approvals, and other exploration or other risks detailed herein and from time to time in the filings made by the Company with securities regulators. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause such actions, events or results to differ materially from those anticipated. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate and accordingly readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date of this article. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation, except to the extent required by law, to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Always do your own due diligence. We seek safe harbor.
This from someone who has shares in a flake mine that has so far failed to ignite much interest. By the way Mr. Berry, a number of industries use caustic bake in bulk processing. One of the reasons Zen has attracted so much interest, in addition to the tonnage and purity it has already demonstrated, is that unlike flake and other graphites, it can use caustic bake. Very disappointed with your research on this story.
Just another paid stooge who missed the boat early, went to bed with a flake and now is crabby. Been holding ZEN since 40 cents and enjoying my 1000% gain with no plans on selling this huge, unique, near infrastructure, well managed Ontario deposit!!
another stooge yes who missed the boat and wants to be greased…..totally biased article IMO, did not do his homework MBA eh……..!
Thank goodness your poorly-written, fact-less article was just posted. Now it takes the heat off my poorly-written, fact-less article!
A very misinformed deduction by Mr. Berry, the very fact that he puts Zenyatta, Ventures in the same category as flakers is quite simply ludicrous. Zen does not have any peers, it is a unique hydrothermal lump type deposit – this is often hard for flake type investors/analyst to understand.
Quite frankly, at best he has shown his hand and he may as well join forces with one of the other paid basher Micky Fulps ( the one that had to revisit BNN and apologize live and explain again why he blatantly misinformed the public about Zenyatta Ventures whilst promoting the flake stocks that he is paid to promote)
Put simply, Mr Berry analysis is very disappointing and is a discredit to his peers intelligence.
Dear oh Dear!
Was Chris in the porta-potty when the proven fact sheet was handed out,?
Did he take umbrage when Mr. Eveleigh said NO to him ?
Are his poor little flake stocks not doing to well?
All sorts of companies/spin-offs are buying property around Zenyatta Ventures hoping to catch a small taste of the action, about 8 that I know of in the past month.
Are the CEO’s of these companies listening to Mr. Berry?
Chris Berry has done serious damage to his reputation by putting out such distorted analysis on Zenyatta Ventures. His followers will be none to pleased with him come mid-September.
Shame really – he should have taken a serious look at the intelligent and well researched European analysts that have recently highly recommended ZEN.